Squier v. CITY OF BIG RAPIDS
724 N.W.2d 473, 477 Mich. 967
This text of 724 N.W.2d 473 (Squier v. CITY OF BIG RAPIDS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Squier v. CITY OF BIG RAPIDS, 724 N.W.2d 473, 477 Mich. 967 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Kimberly SQUIER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Alexander Squier, Brandy Squier, Joshua Squier, and Brice Wernette, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF BIG RAPIDS, Timothy J. Vogel, and Larry Staffen, Defendants-Appellees, and
Orchard Place Estate Trust, Donald L. Trites, and Lawrence Morningstar, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*474 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
724 N.W.2d 473, 477 Mich. 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squier-v-city-of-big-rapids-mich-2006.