Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller
280 F.2d 424, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 268, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4680
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appeal,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed on the mem *425 orandum opinion of District Judge Jones, 175 F.Supp. 667, and that this cause be remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller, 280 F.2d 424, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 268, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4680 (6th Cir. 1960).
280 F.2d 424 (Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Squeez-A-Purse Corp. v. Stiller
175 F. Supp. 667 (N.D. Ohio, 1959)