Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller
280 F.2d 424, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 268, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4680
This text of 280 F.2d 424 (Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Squeez-A-Purse Corporation v. Benjamin Stiller, 280 F.2d 424, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 268, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4680 (6th Cir. 1960).
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appeal,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed on the mem *425 orandum opinion of District Judge Jones, 175 F.Supp. 667, and that this cause be remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Squeez-A-Purse Corp. v. Stiller
175 F. Supp. 667 (N.D. Ohio, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
280 F.2d 424, 126 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 268, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squeez-a-purse-corporation-v-benjamin-stiller-ca6-1960.