Squazzo v. Timken Silent Automatic Co.
249 A.D. 841, 293 N.Y.S. 944, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9955
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1937
StatusPublished
This text of 249 A.D. 841 (Squazzo v. Timken Silent Automatic Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Squazzo v. Timken Silent Automatic Co., 249 A.D. 841, 293 N.Y.S. 944, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 841, 293 N.Y.S. 944, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squazzo-v-timken-silent-automatic-co-nyappdiv-1937.