Square D Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. ex rel. Dadeland Medical Building, Inc.

610 So. 2d 522, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12981, 1992 WL 353428
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 1992·No. No. 91-2865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Statute of Repose cannot be equated with subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, unlike the question of subject matter jurisdiction, the rights accruing to a manufacturer by virtue of the Statute of Repose can be waived if not raised in a timely manner.

In this case, the appellant did not raise the Statute of Repose before the trial court in a timely manner. Accordingly, the applicability of the Statute of Repose to this case was not preserved for our review.

A review of the record fails to demonstrate any reversible error in connection with the other points raised by appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Square D Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. ex rel. Dadeland Medical Building, Inc., 610 So. 2d 522, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12981, 1992 WL 353428 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 522 (Square D Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. ex rel. Dadeland Medical Building, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eddie C. Pratcher, Jr. v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals
407 S.W.3d 727 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2013)
Johnston v. HUDLETT
32 So. 3d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Oates
610 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)