Spurway v. Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc.

68 F.2d 735, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4964
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 1934
DocketNo. 7115
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 F.2d 735 (Spurway v. Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spurway v. Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc., 68 F.2d 735, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4964 (5th Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A final decree was entered in the District Court in favor of appellee upon its bill to enforce specific performance of a contract and for an accounting. Spurway, as receiver of the City National Bank, two other individuals, and two corporations were made parties defendant; and they were all substantially interested in and affected by the decree. The receiver alone has appealed, without joining in the appeal his codefendants, and without taking an order of summons and severance; and the time for doing either has long since expired.

On these grounds appellee moves to dismiss the appeal. Upon the authority of Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179, 13 S. Ct. 39, 36 L. Ed. 933 ; Wilson v. Kiesel, 164 U. S. 248, 17 S. Ct. 124, 41 L. Ed. 422; Garcia v. Vela, 216 U. S. 598, 30 S. Ct. 439, 54 L. Ed. 632, and Hartford Accident & Ind. Co. v. Bunn, 285 U. S. 169, 52 S. Ct. 354, 76 L. Ed. 685, the motion to dismiss must bo and is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Pacific Trust Co.
93 F.2d 821 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 F.2d 735, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurway-v-walker-skagseth-food-stores-inc-ca5-1934.