Spurr v. Spurr

121 N.W. 121, 108 Minn. 521, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 14, 1909
DocketNos. 16,084—(70)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 121 N.W. 121 (Spurr v. Spurr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spurr v. Spurr, 121 N.W. 121, 108 Minn. 521, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying his motion to set aside its decision and findings. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor certificate of the trial judge that the record contains everything offered or considered on the hearing of the motion, nor the certificate of the clerk of the district court that the return contains a true and correct transcript of all the records and files in the action.

Held, following Hospes v. Northwestern Mnfg. & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 43 N. W. 180, that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thoreson v. Quinn
147 N.W. 716 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Radel v. Radel
143 N.W. 741 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Fred v. Segal
141 N.W. 806 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.W. 121, 108 Minn. 521, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurr-v-spurr-minn-1909.