Spurr v. Spurr

121 N.W. 121, 108 Minn. 521, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 14, 1909·No. Nos. 16,084—(70)·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying his motion to set aside its decision and findings. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor certificate of the trial judge that the record contains everything offered or considered on the hearing of the motion, nor the certificate of the clerk of the district court that the return contains a true and correct transcript of all the records and files in the action.

Held, following Hospes v. Northwestern Mnfg. & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 43 N. W. 180, that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spurr v. Spurr, 121 N.W. 121, 108 Minn. 521, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749 (Mich. 1909).

121 N.W. 121 (Spurr v. Spurr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thoreson v. Quinn
147 N.W. 716 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Radel v. Radel
143 N.W. 741 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Fred v. Segal
141 N.W. 806 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)