Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Fourth Circuit

Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

308 F. App'x 669

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2009·No. No. 08-2064·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 3:07-cv-00643-RCC, 2008 WL 3992774 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 3:07-cv-00643-RCC, 2008 WL 3992774 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 308 F. App'x 669 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

308 F. App'x 669 (Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.