Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
This text of 308 F. App'x 669 (Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 3:07-cv-00643-RCC, 2008 WL 3992774 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 F. App'x 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurlock-v-united-states-army-corps-of-engineers-ca4-2009.