Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
This text of 96 F. App'x 916 (Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, *917 we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. CA-02-404-3 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 3, 2004). Spurlock’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurlock-v-united-states-army-corps-of-engineers-ca4-2004.