Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

96 F. App'x 916
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2004·No. 04-1279·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, *917 we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. CA-02-404-3 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 3, 2004). Spurlock’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 96 F. App'x 916 (4th Cir. 2004).

96 F. App'x 916 (Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spurlock v. Army Corps of Engineers
543 U.S. 937 (Supreme Court, 2004)