Spurlin Mercantile Co. v. Lauchheimer & Sons
This text of 48 So. 812 (Spurlin Mercantile Co. v. Lauchheimer & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It has been often held by this court that, to maintain a judgment by default against a corporation, the record or judgment entry must recite the fact that proof was made to the court that the person on whom process was served was at the time of service such an officer or agent of the defendant as by law, was authorized to receive service of process for and in behalf of the defendant. — Southern Home Co. v. Gillespie, 121 Ala. 295, 25 South. 564, and cases cited. The judgment entry discloses no such fact in the case at bar, nor does it appear elsewhere in the record. Yet the defendant is sued as a corporation.
The judgment of the city court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 812, 159 Ala. 512, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurlin-mercantile-co-v-lauchheimer-sons-ala-1909.