Spurgeon v. Central Iron & Steel Co.

63 N.E. 1124, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 94
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 1902
DocketNo. 3,501
StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.E. 1124 (Spurgeon v. Central Iron & Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spurgeon v. Central Iron & Steel Co., 63 N.E. 1124, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 94 (Ind. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Appellant was plaintiff below, and her complaint is a duplicate of the complaint in the case of O’Brien v. Central Iron and Steel Co., 63 N. E. 302, decided by the Supreme Court, March 18,1902, except as to descriptions of real estate.

A demurrer to her complaint was sustained, and, refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against her for costs.

[700]*700Upon, the authority of the O’Brien case, it must be held that the complaint states a cause of action, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to it.

The judgment is reversed, and the court below is directed to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. Central Iron & Steel Co.
57 L.R.A. 508 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.E. 1124, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurgeon-v-central-iron-steel-co-indctapp-1902.