Spurgeon v. Central Iron & Steel Co.
This text of 63 N.E. 1124 (Spurgeon v. Central Iron & Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was plaintiff below, and her complaint is a duplicate of the complaint in the case of O’Brien v. Central Iron and Steel Co., 63 N. E. 302, decided by the Supreme Court, March 18,1902, except as to descriptions of real estate.
A demurrer to her complaint was sustained, and, refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against her for costs.
[700]*700Upon, the authority of the O’Brien case, it must be held that the complaint states a cause of action, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to it.
The judgment is reversed, and the court below is directed to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.E. 1124, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spurgeon-v-central-iron-steel-co-indctapp-1902.