Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Spunt v. Spunt

Spunt v. Spunt

34 So. 3d 17, 2010 WL 834388
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2010
Docket4D08-1319
StatusPublished

This text of 34 So. 3d 17 (Spunt v. Spunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spunt v. Spunt, 34 So. 3d 17, 2010 WL 834388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ARLENE R. SPUNT, Appellant,
v.
GERALD A. SPUNT, as Trustee of the Trust of Matilda M. Spunt, MEREDITH FAY SPUNT COHEN, EMILY ANNE SPUNT YEMINI, and ADAM ELLIOT SPUNT, Appellees.

No. 4D08-1319.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 10, 2010.

Julie A. Hill and William F. Murphy of Murphy & O'Brien, LLC, North Miami, for appellant.

James R. Sloto of Sloto & Associates, P.L., Miami, for appellee Gerald A. Spunt, as Trustee of the Trust of Matilda M. Spunt.

Scott A. Weiss of Selzer & Weiss, Attorneys at Law, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Meredith Cohen, Emily Yemini, and Adam Spunt.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 So. 3d 17, 2010 WL 834388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spunt-v-spunt-fladistctapp-2010.