Spunizo v. CHARITY HOSP. IN NEW ORLEANS
This text of 705 So. 2d 1085 (Spunizo v. CHARITY HOSP. IN NEW ORLEANS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward SPUNIZO and wife, Norma Spunizo
v.
CHARITY HOSPITAL IN NEW ORLEANS.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Pretermitting the issue of whether other provisions of the medical malpractice act apply to plaintiffs' action, the medical review panel provisions clearly apply as of the time of the filing of the claim. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the judgment of the trial court maintaining relator's exception of prematurity is reinstated.
CALOGERO, C.J., would deny the writ.
VICTORY, J., not on panel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
705 So. 2d 1085, 1998 WL 12428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spunizo-v-charity-hosp-in-new-orleans-la-1998.