Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Spungin v. Spungin

Spungin v. Spungin

124 A.D.2d 690, 507 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61994
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 690 (Spungin v. Spungin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spungin v. Spungin, 124 A.D.2d 690, 507 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

The court properly found the reconciliation agreement between the parties to be void and unenforceable because the defendant’s attorney of record was not present during the negotiations or signing of this agreement and had not been discharged pursuant to CPLR 321 (b) (see, Moustakas v Bouloukos, 112 AD2d 981). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tremont v. Tremont
35 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Yohay v. Papaleo
273 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Shields v. Shields
156 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 690, 507 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spungin-v-spungin-nyappdiv-1986.