Spungin v. Spungin
124 A.D.2d 690, 507 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1986·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The court properly found the reconciliation agreement between the parties to be void and unenforceable because the defendant’s attorney of record was not present during the negotiations or signing of this agreement and had not been discharged pursuant to CPLR 321 (b) (see, Moustakas v Bouloukos, 112 AD2d 981). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spungin v. Spungin, 124 A.D.2d 690, 507 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 690 (Spungin v. Spungin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tremont v. Tremont
35 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Yohay v. Papaleo
273 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Shields v. Shields
156 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)