Spulecki v. Geier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spulecki v. Geier

2 A.D.2d 953, 156 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 953 (Spulecki v. Geier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spulecki v. Geier, 2 A.D.2d 953, 156 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendant shall, within 10 days, stipulate to increase the verdict to the sum of $2,500, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find the verdict of the jury inadequate to compensate properly the plaintiff for the injuries he received. All concur. (Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of Brie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendant shall, within 10 days, stipulate to increase the verdict to the sum of $2,500, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We find the verdict of the jury inadequate to compensate properly the plaintiff for the injuries he received. All concur. (Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of Brie Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 953, 156 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spulecki-v-geier-nyappdiv-1956.