Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric

181 L. Ed. 2d 476, 132 S. Ct. 781, 565 U.S. 1052, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380, 80 U.S.L.W. 3319
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 28, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6806
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 476 (Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric, 181 L. Ed. 2d 476, 132 S. Ct. 781, 565 U.S. 1052, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380, 80 U.S.L.W. 3319 (U.S. 2011).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

[477]*477Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 358.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Daniel Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric
415 F. App'x 358 (Third Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 476, 132 S. Ct. 781, 565 U.S. 1052, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380, 80 U.S.L.W. 3319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spuck-v-ammerman-fredric-scotus-2011.