Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric
This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 476 (Spuck v. Ammerman Fredric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
[477]*477Same case below, 415 Fed. Appx. 358.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 L. Ed. 2d 476, 132 S. Ct. 781, 565 U.S. 1052, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8380, 80 U.S.L.W. 3319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spuck-v-ammerman-fredric-scotus-2011.