Spuck, D., Pet v. Progress Newspaper
This text of Spuck, D., Pet v. Progress Newspaper (Spuck, D., Pet v. Progress Newspaper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
DANIEL L. SPUCK, : No. 216 WAL 2016 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : PROGRESS NEWSPAPER, INC. : JANE/JOHN DOES, : PARTIES/EMPLOYEES OF, AND : LELAND B. MATHER, JR., CHIEF : EDITIOR, ET AL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is DENIED.
Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Spuck, D., Pet v. Progress Newspaper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spuck-d-pet-v-progress-newspaper-pa-2016.