Spruill v. Dominy
This text of 91 S.E.2d 43 (Spruill v. Dominy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a determination of the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly is not essential to a decision in the cause, its alleged invalidity will not be reviewed by this court.
2. This case is controlled by the rulings of this court in Lively v. Grimstead, 210 Ga. 361 (80 S. E. 2d 316). Section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 565, 567; Code, Ann. Supp., § 92A-602), provides for a hearing before the director upon the request of any person aggrieved by any order or acts of the director under the provisions of the act, and for an appeal to the superior court. From the allegations of the petition it is nowhere made to appear that the petitioner has exhausted his statutory remedy, and his petition fails to state a cause of action for extraordinary equitable relief.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E.2d 43, 212 Ga. 145, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spruill-v-dominy-ga-1956.