Spruill v. Dominy

91 S.E.2d 43, 212 Ga. 145, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 279
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 9, 1956·No. 19164·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

1. Where a determination of the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly is not essential to a decision in the cause, its alleged invalidity will not be reviewed by this court.

2. This case is controlled by the rulings of this court in Lively v. Grimstead, 210 Ga. 361 (80 S. E. 2d 316). Section 2 of the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 565, 567; Code, Ann. Supp., § 92A-602), provides for a hearing before the director upon the request of any person aggrieved by any order or acts of the director under the provisions of the act, and for an appeal to the superior court. From the allegations of the petition it is nowhere made to appear that the petitioner has exhausted his statutory remedy, and his petition fails to state a cause of action for extraordinary equitable relief.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spruill v. Dominy, 91 S.E.2d 43, 212 Ga. 145, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 279 (Ga. 1956).

91 S.E.2d 43 (Spruill v. Dominy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Danielsville v. Seagraves
305 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Pope v. Cokinos
200 S.E.2d 275 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Waller v. Conner
129 S.E.2d 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Coffey v. City of Marietta
91 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)