Spruill v. . Bonner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Spruill v. . Bonner

106 S.E. 842, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 112

DecidedMarch 9, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 842 (Spruill v. . Bonner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spruill v. . Bonner, 106 S.E. 842, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 112 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This was a controversy over an alleged sale of 177 barrels of Irish potatoes. Upon issue joined, the jury found that the potatoes in question.were not purchased by the defendant, W. S. Bonner, but that plaintiff sold the same to one M. P. McCann. This was a question of fact which the jury has answered in favor of the defendant.

We have carefully examined the record and find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict and judgment.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

This was a controversy over an alleged sale of 177 barrels of Irish potatoes. Upon issue joined, the jury found that the potatoes in question.were not purchased by the defendant, W. S. Bonner, but that plaintiff sold the same to one M. P. McCann. This was a question of fact which the jury has answered in favor of the defendant.

We have carefully examined the record and find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict and judgment.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.E. 842, 181 N.C. 480, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spruill-v-bonner-nc-1921.