Spruance v. Myerdirck
43 A. 479, 18 Del. 205, 2 Penne. 205, 1899 Del. LEXIS 30
This text of 43 A. 479 (Spruance v. Myerdirck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spruance v. Myerdirck, 43 A. 479, 18 Del. 205, 2 Penne. 205, 1899 Del. LEXIS 30 (Del. Ct. App. 1899).
Opinion
The bill of particulars is not sufficient, for the reason that none of the items set out therein are admissible under either of the counts of the declaration; that is, for money had and received, or on an account stated. We therefore order that a further bill of particulars be filed.
The plaintiff,, upon his application, is granted leave to amend.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 A. 479, 18 Del. 205, 2 Penne. 205, 1899 Del. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spruance-v-myerdirck-delsuperct-1899.