Sprowl v. Simpkins

3 Ala. 515
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Ala. 515 (Sprowl v. Simpkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sprowl v. Simpkins, 3 Ala. 515 (Ala. 1842).

Opinion

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The statute passed in 1837, requires notes, payable to bearer, to be assigned by the person whose name is mentioned on the face, before a,suit can be maintained in the name of the holder: Meek’s Sup, 108. But it has no operation on notes then in existence.

As this is the only question insisted on, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Georgia, F. & A. Ry. Co.
104 So. 33 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ala. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprowl-v-simpkins-ala-1842.