Sprowl v. Simpkins
3 Ala. 515
Opinion
The statute passed in 1837, requires notes, payable to bearer, to be assigned by the person whose name is mentioned on the face, before a,suit can be maintained in the name of the holder: Meek’s Sup, 108. But it has no operation on notes then in existence.
As this is the only question insisted on, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sprowl v. Simpkins, 3 Ala. 515 (Ala. 1842).
3 Ala. 515 (Sprowl v. Simpkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Georgia, F. & A. Ry. Co.
104 So. 33 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)