Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.
156 N.W. 158, 162 Wis. 279, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 136
This text of 156 N.W. 158 (Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co., 156 N.W. 158, 162 Wis. 279, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 136 (Wis. 1916).
Opinion
In tbis case it is held:
1. Tbat tbe sale of tbe mill at Eond du Lac was not an interstate commerce transaction, nor was it a necessary incident to tbe carrying on of such commerce.
2. Tbat tbe contract, in so far as it involved such mill, was a contract relating to property within tbe state and was void under sec. 1770b, Stats.
By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Unitype Co. v. Schwittay
170 N.W. 651 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1919)
Regina Co. v. Toynbee
158 N.W. 313 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
156 N.W. 158, 162 Wis. 279, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprout-waldron-co-v-amery-mercantile-co-wis-1916.