Sprout, Waldron & Co. v. Amery Mercantile Co.

156 N.W. 158, 162 Wis. 279, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 136

Opinion

Barkes, J.

In tbis case it is held:

1. Tbat tbe sale of tbe mill at Eond du Lac was not an interstate commerce transaction, nor was it a necessary incident to tbe carrying on of such commerce.

2. Tbat tbe contract, in so far as it involved such mill, was a contract relating to property within tbe state and was void under sec. 1770b, Stats.

By the Gourt. — Judgment affirmed.