Sprouse v. Sprouse
92 S.W.3d 502, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1244, 2002 Tex. LEXIS 133, 2002 WL 1981369
This text of 92 S.W.3d 502 (Sprouse v. Sprouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sprouse v. Sprouse, 92 S.W.3d 502, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1244, 2002 Tex. LEXIS 133, 2002 WL 1981369 (Tex. 2002).
Opinion
This case involves an important question-whether the dormancy provisions in Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code sections 31.006 and 34.001 apply to past-due child support payments. We explicitly reserved this question in In re AD., 73 S.W.3d 244, 249 (Tex.2002). But because of the state of this record, we decline to decide the question here. The petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Isaacs v. Isaacs
338 S.W.3d 184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Manuel R. Issacs v. Julia Ann McKinney Issacs A/K/A Julia Parton
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
in the Interest of A.A.P.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
in the Interest of R. D. and E. D., Children
102 S.W.3d 859 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
In Re ED
102 S.W.3d 859 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 S.W.3d 502, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1244, 2002 Tex. LEXIS 133, 2002 WL 1981369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprouse-v-sprouse-tex-2002.