Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 407

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 19, 1956

DocketNo. 59863; protest 242694-K (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 407 (Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sprouse-Reitz Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 407 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of blue willow coffee mugs, composed of earthenware having a nonvitrified absorbent body, ornamented, painted, printed, or decorated, and that if said merchandise were now before the appraiser for classification, it would be described and advisorily classified as tableware, kitchenware, or table or kitchen utensils at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of blue willow coffee mugs, composed of earthenware having a nonvitrified absorbent body, ornamented, painted, printed, or decorated, and that if said merchandise were now before the appraiser for classification, it would be described and advisorily classified as tableware, kitchenware, or table or kitchen utensils at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 211, as modified, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprouse-reitz-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.