Sproule v. McCutcheon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sproule v. McCutcheon

687 So. 2d 77, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 390, 1997 WL 43863

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 1997

DocketNo. 96-4008

StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 77 (Sproule v. McCutcheon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sproule v. McCutcheon, 687 So. 2d 77, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 390, 1997 WL 43863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and order that an adversarial probable cause hearing be held on L.T. case no. 96-11537 within a reasonable time. The filing of an information twenty-nine (29) days after the petitioner’s arrest did not meet the requirements of the rule. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.133(a)(1) & (b)(1); see also Bannister v. Hendry, 625 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 630 So.2d 1098 (Fla.1993).

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and order that an adversarial probable cause hearing be held on L.T. case no. 96-11537 within a reasonable time. The filing of an information twenty-nine (29) days after the petitioner’s arrest did not meet the requirements of the rule. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.133(a)(1) & (b)(1); see also Bannister v. Hendry, 625 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 630 So.2d 1098 (Fla.1993).

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 So. 2d 77, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 390, 1997 WL 43863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sproule-v-mccutcheon-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack