Sproul v. Huston

84 P. 631, 42 Wash. 106, 1906 Wash. LEXIS 537

• Court: Washington Supreme Court
• Decided: March 2, 1906
• Docket: No. 5965
• Status: Published

Opinion

Root, J.

— Respondent and appellants entered into a contract by which respondent was to receive $2.50 per thousand feet for cutting and delivering certain timber at the railway track of appellants. Respondent brought this action to reicover damages against appellants on account of an alleged breach of said contract. The trial was had before the court without, a jury. The trial judge made findings and conclusions, although not separately stating them. A judgment in the sum of $250 was made and entered in favor of respondent. Appeal is taken therefrom.

It is urged by appellants that the findings do not justify this judgment. An examination reveals no finding whatever as to the amount of the damages sustained by respondent. The nearest approach to a finding of this character is that where the trial judge states “that there was some saw timber to be taken off by plaintiff under his agreement, and plaintiff would have made some profits thereby.” This could justify a judgment in nothing more than a nominal sum. Elsewhere there is a finding to the effect that appellants had advanced $150 to respondent. There is nothing to show that his damages exceeded this sum. The evidence is not brought to this court, and we must pass upon the sufficiency of the findings. We deem them insufficient to sustain the judgment for $250 made and entered by the court. The judgment will therefore be reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to make a finding as to the amount of damages sustained by the respondent, if any.

Mount, O. J., Crow, Dunbar, Hadley, Fullerton, and Rudkin, JJ., concur.