Sprote v. Marshall

4 Greene 344
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJuly 1, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Greene 344 (Sprote v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sprote v. Marshall, 4 Greene 344 (iowa 1854).

Opinion

Opinion lyy

Hall, J.

This cause was originally commenced. before a justice of the peace. On the trial before the justice, there was a judgment against the defendant. Thereupon the defendant sued out a writ of error from the district court and the justice certified the cause to that court, where the cause was heard and the judgment of the justice reversed, and the cause remanded to the justice for a new trial, and a judgment rendered against the defendant in error for costs. The plaintiff, in the writ of error, from the district court, gave no notice whatever to the defendant, of the suing out of the writ, or of the pendency of the suit in the district court. The whole proceedings were exparte.

This judgment must be set aside and held as a nullity. Judicial proceedings against a person over whom the court has acquired no jurisdiction through its process or otherwise, are mere waste paper, and will be treated as nullities.,

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Greene 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprote-v-marshall-iowa-1854.