Sprinkles v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Sprinkles v. Commonwealth

191 S.W.2d 218, 301 Ky. 161, 1945 Ky. LEXIS 711

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedDecember 11, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 191 S.W.2d 218 (Sprinkles v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sprinkles v. Commonwealth, 191 S.W.2d 218, 301 Ky. 161, 1945 Ky. LEXIS 711 (Ky. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Reversing

*162 Mae Sprinkles was charged with selling liquor in local option territory. Upon her trial she was found guilty and her punishment fixed at a fine of $60 and 30 days in jail. She has moved this Court for an appeal, which is granted, because we believe the judgment of conviction to be erroneous.

The name of the person to whom the appellant was alleged to have sold the liquor was not set out in the descriptive part of the indictment, nor was it stated that the name of the person was unknown. This was a fatal defect. Johnson v. Commonwealth, 299 Ky. 72, 184 S. W. 2d 812, and cases cited therein.

It was also error to instruct the jury to find the appellant guilty, if they believed that she had liquor in her possession for sale in local option territory, because the indictment made no reference to this offense.

Judgment reversed, with directions to set it aside, and for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI