Sprinkle v. State
This text of Sprinkle v. State (Sprinkle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE FILED NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION December 10, 1997
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk CHARLES SPRINKLE, ) C.C.A. No. 03C01-9612-CR-00474 Appellant, ) ) Hawkins County V. ) ) Honorable James E. Beckner, Judge ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) (Post-Conviction) Appellee. )
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
Charles Sprinkle, Pro Se John Knox Walkup N.E.C.C. Attorney General & Reporter P.O. Box 5000 Mountain City, TN 37683-5000 Marvin E. Clements, Jr. Assistant Attorney General 450 James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0493
C. Berkeley Bell, Jr. District Attorney General
Doug Godbee Assistant District Attorney General Main Street, Hawkins County Courthouse Rogersville, TN 37857
OPINION FILED: ___________________
AFFIRMED
PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge OPINION
In 1985 the appellant, Charles Sprinkle, was convicted of aggravated rape
and incest. He received an effective sentence of fifty-three years incarceration in
the Tennessee Department of Correction. In 1996 he filed a petition for post-
conviction relief alleging that the indictment against him was insufficient for failing
to allege a mens rea. The trial court dismissed the petition as time barred. He
appeals this dismissal. Upon review, we affirm.
The appellant's convictions became final over eleven years ago. At that
time the law allowed three years to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Tenn.
Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (repealed 1995). The appellant's time period for filing
his petition has expired. Therefore, his petition is time barred.
Accordingly, we find no error of law mandating reversal. The trial court's
dismissal of the petition is affirmed in accordance with Tenn. R. Ct. Crim. App.,
Rule 20.
__________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge
CONCUR:
-2- ______________________________ JOSEPH B. JONES, Presiding Judge
______________________________ J. CURWOOD WITT, JR., Judge
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sprinkle v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprinkle-v-state-tenncrimapp-1997.