Sprinkle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sprinkle v. State

1930 OK CR 255, 288 P. 1118, 47 Okla. Crim. 407, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 404

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 31, 1930

DocketNo. A-7363.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 255 (Sprinkle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sprinkle v. State, 1930 OK CR 255, 288 P. 1118, 47 Okla. Crim. 407, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 404 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Pontotoc county on a charge of forgery in the second degree, and his punishment fixed by the court at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of 5 years.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 13th day of May, 1929. No' briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI