Sprinkle v. Sprinkle

86 S.E.2d 422, 241 N.C. 713, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 442
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 23, 1955·No. 17·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Winborne, J.

Decisions of tbis Court bold that wben a Judge of Superior Court bears a motion to set aside a judgment for mistake, surprise or excusable neglect, Gr.S. 1-220, it is bis duty, upon request so to do, to find tbe facts not only in respect to tbe grounds on wbicb tbe motion is made, but as to meritorious defense. Failure to do so is error. Holcomb v. Holcomb, 192 N.C. 504, 135 S.E. 287; McLeod v. Gooch, 162 N.C. 122, 78 S.E. 4. See also Parnell v. Ivey, 213 N.C. 644, 197 S.E. 128.

Tbe same rule would apply to bearing on motion to vacate an order for reason that it was made without notice. G.S. 1-582.

Hence tbe court below erred in declining to find tbe facts in these respects, — having been requested so to do.

Tbe cause will be remanded for further proceedings as to right and justice appertains, and as tbe law provides.

Error and remanded.

BaRNHill, C. J., took no part in tbe consideration and decision of tbis case. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sprinkle v. Sprinkle, 86 S.E.2d 422, 241 N.C. 713, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 442 (N.C. 1955).

86 S.E.2d 422 (Sprinkle v. Sprinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaglio v. Town & Campus International, Inc.
322 S.E.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Bell v. Martin
258 S.E.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Texas Western Financial Corp. v. Mann
243 S.E.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Atwater Motor Co.
241 S.E.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Haiduven v. Cooper
208 S.E.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)