Sprinkle v. Schilling

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7086

DAVID FRANK SPRINKLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRED SCHILLING, Director; STANLEY CYPRESS, Medical Doctor; NURSE ELKO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00335-GEC)

Submitted: September 11, 2007 Decided: September 17, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Frank Sprinkle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Frank Sprinkle appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Sprinkle v. Schilling, No. 7:07-cv-00335-gec

(W.D. Va. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -