Sprinkle v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Sprinkle v. Davis

115 F.2d 625, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 6, 1941·No. No. 4734·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.

The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.

The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Sprinkle v. Davis, 115 F.2d 625, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490 (4th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

115 F.2d 625 (Sprinkle v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related