Sprinkle v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Sprinkle v. Davis

115 F.2d 625, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 1941

DocketNo. 4734

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 F.2d 625 (Sprinkle v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sprinkle v. Davis, 115 F.2d 625, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490 (4th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.

The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.

The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 F.2d 625, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sprinkle-v-davis-ca4-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack