Springut Law PC v. Rates Technology Inc.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 601 (Springut Law PC v. Rates Technology Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered June 1, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment entered March 20, 2015 on the condition that defendants serve and file an answer within 20 days of service of a copy of the order with notice of entry, and denied plaintiff’s request for discovery in connection with defendants’ motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their default in serving a timely answer to the complaint (see Imovegreen, LLC v Frantic, LLC, 139 AD3d 539 [1st Dept 2016]; *724 Meredith v City of New York, 61 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009]). The motion court correctly found that the lack of communication between decedent and his former counsel, the decedent’s myriad medical conditions at the time of the hearing on the motion and defense counsel’s failure to timely withdraw constituted a reasonable excuse for the default and that defendant had valid defenses.
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ request for discovery on the vacatur motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 601, 146 A.D.3d 723, 45 N.Y.S.3d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springut-law-pc-v-rates-technology-inc-nyappdiv-2017.