Springut Law PC v. Rates Technology Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 601, 146 A.D.3d 723, 45 N.Y.S.3d 787
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2017·No. 2937N 156233/14·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered June 1, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment entered March 20, 2015 on the condition that defendants serve and file an answer within 20 days of service of a copy of the order with notice of entry, and denied plaintiff’s request for discovery in connection with defendants’ motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their default in serving a timely answer to the complaint (see Imovegreen, LLC v Frantic, LLC, 139 AD3d 539 [1st Dept 2016]; *724 Meredith v City of New York, 61 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009]). The motion court correctly found that the lack of communication between decedent and his former counsel, the decedent’s myriad medical conditions at the time of the hearing on the motion and defense counsel’s failure to timely withdraw constituted a reasonable excuse for the default and that defendant had valid defenses.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ request for discovery on the vacatur motion.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springut Law PC v. Rates Technology Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 601, 146 A.D.3d 723, 45 N.Y.S.3d 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 601 (Springut Law PC v. Rates Technology Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imovegreen, LLC v. Frantic, LLC
139 A.D.3d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Meredith v. City of New York
61 A.D.3d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)