Springs v. Nurse

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois
DecidedJune 20, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-01440
StatusUnknown

This text of Springs v. Nurse (Springs v. Nurse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springs v. Nurse, (C.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RYAN SPRINGS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 24-1440 ) MINDI NURSE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, pursues this civil rights action. All Defendants have been served, and there are no pending issues requiring discussion. Accordingly, this case is ready for scheduling deadlines. This case is entering the discovery phase, which means that each party should be seeking admissible evidence to support the party's claims or defenses. In general, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26-37 govern discovery between the parties. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 governs discovery from nonparties. Facilitating the discovery process in pro se cases can be difficult, and this Order is being issued in an effort to help explain and streamline the process for the parties to the extent possible. The parties should carefully read this order, which contains important information on deadlines, discovery, and the Court's procedures. Failure to follow the instructions in this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this case. IT IS ORDERED: 1. If not already filed, answers are due as specified in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise directed by the Court or the Central District’s Local Rules. 2. Amendments to a complaint are governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Leave of Court is required to file an amended complaint more

than 21 days after an Answer or other responsive pleading is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). If Plaintiff seeks to file an amended complaint, he must file a motion to do so, attaching the proposed amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint must stand complete on its own, including exhibits. The amended complaint, if accepted, will replace the prior complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff should explain in his motion for leave to file an amended complaint how the amended complaint differs from the complaint on file. Any motions for leave to amend the complaint shall be filed within 90 days of this Order.

3. The parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (See attached consent form). The Court recommends serious consideration of this option. Given this Court’s heavy docket and full calendar of hearings and trials, consent to a U.S. Magistrate may result in a faster disposition and trial date than this Court can provide. 4. If exhaustion of administrative remedies is required under 42 U.S.C. Section 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s claims, motions for summary judgment on exhaustion are due within 30 days of this order. Discovery will not be stayed

unless Defendants file a motion to stay discovery. 5. Within 30 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff shall provide the following to Defendants' counsel, not to the Court: A. The names of the persons with knowledge of the relevant incidents whom Plaintiff may use to support his claims, along with a short description of what each person knows; B. Copies of documents Plaintiff possesses which Plaintiff may

use to support his claims; C. Any information Plaintiff has to help identify the Doe defendants, if Doe Defendants are named; D. A statement of the injuries Plaintiff suffered and the relief Plaintiff seeks. 6. Within 45 days of the entry of this order, Defendants shall provide to Plaintiff, to the extent not already possessed by Plaintiff or provided to Plaintiff:

A. The names and working addresses of the persons with knowledge of the relevant incidents whom Defendants may use to support their defense, along with a short description of what each person knows; B. Plaintiff's relevant medical records; C. Plaintiff's relevant grievances and all responses to those grievances; D. Relevant incident reports and disciplinary committee

decisions; E. The identity of any Doe defendants, if Doe defendants are named. If Defendants are unable to ascertain the identity of a Doe Defendant, Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff any information relevant to assisting Plaintiff to identify the Doe Defendant. F. Copies of any other documents, whether paper or

electronically stored, which Defendants may use to support their claims or defenses. 7. Within 10 days of receiving from Defendants' counsel an authorization to release medical records that are relevant to Plaintiff's claims or Defendants' defenses, Plaintiff is directed to sign and return the authorization to Defendants' counsel. 8. The parties are under a continuing obligation to supplement or correct the disclosures ordered above, as well as any discovery responses. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(c). This means the parties must update the information they have provided as additional information becomes available. 9. If Plaintiff has named Doe defendants, Plaintiff must file a motion to substitute the real name of any "Doe" defendant within 60 days of the entry of this order or risk dismissal of the Doe defendant without prejudice unless good cause for the failure can be shown. 10. If Plaintiff plans to use expert testimony, Plaintiff's expert disclosures under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) are due to Defendants

within 60 days of this order. 11. If Defendants plan to use expert testimony, Defendants' expert disclosures under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) are due to Plaintiff within 90 days of this order. The disclosures are not filed in Court. 12. Plaintiff's indigency and detention may effectively limit Plaintiff's

discovery to written requests for information. Written discovery to Defendants includes requests for the production of documents (Fed. R. Civ. P. 34), interrogatories (Fed. R. Civ. P. 33), and requests for admission (Fed. R. Civ. P. 36). In general, the federal rules give 30 days for a party to respond to discovery requests. Discovery requests and responses are not filed with the Court, unless they are the subject of a motion to compel. 13. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(1) allows parties to serve no more than 25 written interrogatories, including subparts. Rule 26(b) provides that leave to

increase this number may be granted upon a showing of good cause. 14. Oral depositions are limited to the deposition of Plaintiff, subject to a motion by Defendants to take additional depositions. If Defendants seek to take additional depositions, they must arrange for Plaintiff to participate in the deposition by phone or video, or to arrange for Plaintiff to participate through written questions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c)(3). 15. If a Defendant objects to a discovery request for security reasons or for a reason listed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1)(C), then the Defendant must

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaunte Ott v. City of Milwaukee
682 F.3d 552 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Springs v. Nurse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springs-v-nurse-ilcd-2025.