Springing Acres, Inc. v. Michigana Holsteins, Inc.
725 N.W.2d 339, 477 Mich. 978
This text of 725 N.W.2d 339 (Springing Acres, Inc. v. Michigana Holsteins, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Springing Acres, Inc. v. Michigana Holsteins, Inc., 725 N.W.2d 339, 477 Mich. 978 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
SPRINGING ACRES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MICHIGANA HOLSTEINS, INC., Peter Linssen, and Morris-Anderson & Associates, Ltd., Defendants, and
VDS-Farms, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
725 N.W.2d 339, 477 Mich. 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springing-acres-inc-v-michigana-holsteins-inc-mich-2006.