Springfield Water Co. v. Burgess & Town Council of Darby

49 A. 275, 199 Pa. 400, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 616
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 210·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Mitchell,

Two questions were raised in the court below, first whether plaintiff had legally acquired the rights of the Citizens’ Water Company to lay water pipes in the borough of Darby. This was decided by the court in favor of the appellant. It therefore does not arise on this appeal and we express no opinion upon it.

The second question was whether the ordinance regulating the making of openings, laying pipes, etc., in the streets of the borough, was a reasonable exercise of the police power and therefore binding on the plaintiff. We affirm the judgment upon the opinion of the court below on this point.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springfield Water Co. v. Burgess & Town Council of Darby, 49 A. 275, 199 Pa. 400, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 616 (Pa. 1901).

49 A. 275 (Springfield Water Co. v. Burgess & Town Council of Darby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Heidelberg Township Water Co.
48 Pa. D. & C. 511 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)
Frackville Sewerage Co. v. Jones
29 Pa. D. & C. 676 (Schuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1937)
Huston v. City of Des Moines
176 Iowa 455 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
Pottsville Borough v. Pottsville Gas Co.
33 Pa. Super. 480 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Commonwealth v. Shafer
32 Pa. Super. 497 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Edgewood Borough v. Scott
29 Pa. Super. 156 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Philadelphia, Harrisburg & Pittsburg Railroad
23 Pa. Super. 205 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)