Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Springfield v. State

Springfield v. State

54 S.E. 172, 125 Ga. 281, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 133
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 54 S.E. 172 (Springfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springfield v. State, 54 S.E. 172, 125 Ga. 281, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 133 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

On the trial of one charged with the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, where the evidence submitted by the State tends to show that the defendant was the seller, and the defendant in his statement claims that he was not the seller but was the agent óf the purchaser, and, as such agent, bought the liquor from another person in a county where the sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited, it is not error for .the court in its charge to state, in effect, that-the evidence shows an illegal sale of liquor, and that the only question is whether the defendant sold the liquor. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wooten v. State
170 S.E. 392 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Bailey v. State
145 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Pruitt v. State
138 S.E. 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Thomas v. State
107 S.E. 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Davis v. State
100 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Georgia Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Jernigan
57 S.E. 791 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 S.E. 172, 125 Ga. 281, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-v-state-ga-1906.