Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co.
123 F. App'x 156
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment on his Title VII, intentional torts, negligence and wrongful termination claims. For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s order, we AFFIRM.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co., 123 F. App'x 156 (5th Cir. 2005).
123 F. App'x 156 (Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.