Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co.
This text of 123 F. App'x 156 (Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals from the district court’s decision granting summary judgment on his Title VII, intentional torts, negligence and wrongful termination claims. For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s order, we AFFIRM.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-v-heilig-meyers-furniture-co-ca5-2005.