Springfield v. City of St. Louis
256 S.W.3d 615, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 2008 WL 2586326
Opinion
ORDER
Lisa Springfield appeals the judgment upholding her termination. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Springfield v. City of St. Louis, 256 S.W.3d 615, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 2008 WL 2586326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
256 S.W.3d 615 (Springfield v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Keefe & Keefe, P.C.
256 S.W.3d 615 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)