Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos

314 U.S. 663, 62 S. Ct. 123
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 20, 1941
DocketNo. 160
StatusPublished

This text of 314 U.S. 663 (Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos, 314 U.S. 663, 62 S. Ct. 123 (1941).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio. It does not appear from the record that the federal [664]*664question presented by the petition was necessarily decided by the court below. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied. Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Honeyman v. Hanan, 300 U. S. 14, 18.

Mr. Joseph A. Padway for petitioners. Messrs. A. C. Link and Samuel A. Bowman for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynch v. New York Ex Rel. Pierson
293 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Honeyman v. Hanan
300 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 U.S. 663, 62 S. Ct. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-ohio-local-no-352-v-settos-scotus-1941.