Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos

314 U.S. 663, 62 S. Ct. 123
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1941·No. No. 160·Published

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio. It does not appear from the record that the federal [664]*664question presented by the petition was necessarily decided by the court below. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied. Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52; Honeyman v. Hanan, 300 U. S. 14, 18.

Mr. Joseph A. Padway for petitioners. Messrs. A. C. Link and Samuel A. Bowman for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos, 314 U.S. 663, 62 S. Ct. 123 (1941).

314 U.S. 663 (Springfield, Ohio, Local No. 352 v. Settos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynch v. New York Ex Rel. Pierson
293 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Honeyman v. Hanan
300 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1937)