Springfield & Memphis Railroad v. Lambert

42 Ark. 121
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 Ark. 121 (Springfield & Memphis Railroad v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springfield & Memphis Railroad v. Lambert, 42 Ark. 121 (Ark. 1883).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Witnesses were summoned on behalf of the defendants, in two civil cases pending in Lawrence Circuit Court, wherein the railroad company was plaintiff. They attended, to testify, and proved up their attendance in eaich case. The cases were determined against the company. The clerk taxed their ferriage and per diem allowance in both cases. The company moved the court for a retaxation of costs, insisting that the witnesses wrere entitled to •claim their attendance in one case only. But the Circuit-Court decided otherwise.

Sections 39 and 40 of the fees act of February 25, 1875, provide that witnesses shall be allowed compensation for each day’s attendance before the Circuit Court in •civil and criminal cases, $1.50 ; but in criminal cases, when the costs are paid by the county, they shall be allowed pay in but one case, no matter in how manji cases they are •summoned or called upon to testify. But for this exception, the county would be liable, when the cases are determined adversely to the State, for their fees in all the criminal cases, where they have attended in obedience to a subpoena, as decided in Pulaski County v. Downer, 10 Ark., 588.

The statute contains no exceptions as to double pay in civil causes, and the courts can make none, as they have no power to legislate. Erwin v. Turner, 6 Ark., 14; State Bank v. Morris, 13 Ib., 291; Pryor v. Ryburn, 16 Ib., 671; Maclin v. Thompson, 17 Ib., 199; Smith v. Macon, 20 Ib., 17; Bennett v. Worthington, 24, Ib., 487.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Webster
137 S.W. 1103 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ark. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-memphis-railroad-v-lambert-ark-1883.