Springfield & Illinois Southeastern Railway Co. v. Hall

67 Ill. 99
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a proceeding to condemn a right of way, commenced under the act of 1852. ■ Before the trial in the circuit court the act of 1872 had taken effect, and the damages were assessed under the rule prescribed in that act. This was un.questionably right. The later act expressly repealed all conflicting provisions in the former, and where proceedings of this character were in fieri, it would necessarily follow that they must be completed under the new law. The State has the right to say on what terms it will allow its right of eminent domain to be exercised, so long as anything remains to be done by the corporation in order to complete the condemnation of the land.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springfield & Illinois Southeastern Railway Co. v. Hall, 67 Ill. 99 (Ill. 1873).

67 Ill. 99 (Springfield & Illinois Southeastern Railway Co. v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sanders
36 S.E.2d 397 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1945)
City of Los Angeles v. Oliver
283 P. 298 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Wade v. State Highway Commission
124 S.E. 193 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
People ex rel. Foote v. Clark
119 N.E. 329 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1918)
Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. Guthrie
61 N.E. 658 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)
Miller v. City of Asheville
16 S.E. 762 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
St. Joseph & Iowa Railroad v. Cudmore
103 Mo. 634 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)
Treacy v. Elizabethtown, Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad
3 S.W. 168 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1887)