Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson

1912 OK 299, 123 P. 1127, 32 Okla. 691, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 316
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 9, 1912·No. 1778·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The history of this case is set forth, and the identical questions involved herein are considered and fully disposed of, by the opinion of this court in the case of Shawnee Fire Insurance Company v. Thompson & Rowell et al., 30 Okla. 466, 119 Pac. 986, and we hereby adopt and promulgate the opinion in that case as and for the opinion in this case. The judgment of the district court of Pawnee county should therefore be modified, so as to permit a recovery by defendants in error of $320.42 on the item of fixtures, under policy No. Ill, and the further sum of $138 for the return of premium on policy No. 115, and the further sum of $43 as return of premium on policy No. 116, making a total of $501.42, and the judgment rendered in the court below on policy No. 116 on the item of stock in the sum of $1,087.66, should be reversed, and all costs should be equally divided between the plaintiff in error and the defendants in error.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson, 1912 OK 299, 123 P. 1127, 32 Okla. 691, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 316 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 299 (Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. Wilkes Et Ux.
1913 OK 352 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
McKain v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.
1912 OK 810 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)