Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson

1912 OK 299, 123 P. 1127, 32 Okla. 691, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 316

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 9, 1912

Docket1778

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1912 OK 299 (Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Thompson, 1912 OK 299, 123 P. 1127, 32 Okla. 691, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 316 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The history of this case is set forth, and the identical questions involved herein are considered and fully disposed of, by the opinion of this court in the case of Shawnee Fire Insurance Company v. Thompson & Rowell et al., 30 Okla. 466, 119 Pac. 986, and we hereby adopt and promulgate the opinion in that case as and for the opinion in this case. The judgment of the district court of Pawnee county should therefore be modified, so as to permit a recovery by defendants in error of $320.42 on the item of fixtures, under policy No. Ill, and the further sum of $138 for the return of premium on policy No. 115, and the further sum of $43 as return of premium on policy No. 116, making a total of $501.42, and the judgment rendered in the court below on policy No. 116 on the item of stock in the sum of $1,087.66, should be reversed, and all costs should be equally divided between the plaintiff in error and the defendants in error.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The history of this case is set forth, and the identical questions involved herein are considered and fully disposed of, by the opinion of this court in the case of Shawnee Fire Insurance Company v. Thompson & Rowell et al., 30 Okla. 466, 119 Pac. 986, and we hereby adopt and promulgate the opinion in that case as and for the opinion in this case. The judgment of the district court of Pawnee county should therefore be modified, so as to permit a recovery by defendants in error of $320.42 on the item of fixtures, under policy No. Ill, and the further sum of $138 for the return of premium on policy No. 115, and the further sum of $43 as return of premium on policy No. 116, making a total of $501.42, and the judgment rendered in the court below on policy No. 116 on the item of stock in the sum of $1,087.66, should be reversed, and all costs should be equally divided between the plaintiff in error and the defendants in error.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 299, 123 P. 1127, 32 Okla. 691, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-fire-marine-ins-v-thompson-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack