Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West
This text of 55 Mass. 388 (Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As a general rule, matter cannot be pleaded in bar, on a scire facias, which would have been a good defence to the original action. The judgment is conclusive. Wilcox v. Mills, 4 Mass. 218; Henriques v. Dutch E. I. Co., 2 L. Raym. 1532, commented upon by Nelson, J., in Welland Canal Co. v. Hathaway, 8 Wend. 481. The bail is estopped from denying that his principal was liable to arrest. Stever v. Sornberger, 24 Wend. 274. Where a foreign consul was sued in a state court, and judgment went against him by default, the bail were not allowed, on a scire facias, to plead the official character of the original defendant, in defence ; they were estopped by the judgment. Hall v. Young, 3 Pick. 80. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Mass. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springfield-card-manufacturing-co-v-west-mass-1848.