Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West

55 Mass. 388
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1848·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

As a general rule, matter cannot be pleaded in bar, on a scire facias, which would have been a good defence to the original action. The judgment is conclusive. Wilcox v. Mills, 4 Mass. 218; Henriques v. Dutch E. I. Co., 2 L. Raym. 1532, commented upon by Nelson, J., in Welland Canal Co. v. Hathaway, 8 Wend. 481. The bail is estopped from denying that his principal was liable to arrest. Stever v. Sornberger, 24 Wend. 274. Where a foreign consul was sued in a state court, and judgment went against him by default, the bail were not allowed, on a scire facias, to plead the official character of the original defendant, in defence ; they were estopped by the judgment. Hall v. Young, 3 Pick. 80. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West, 55 Mass. 388 (Mass. 1848).

55 Mass. 388 (Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stever v. Sornberger
24 Wend. 274 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Wilcox v. Mills
4 Mass. 218 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1808)