Springer v. State

77 So. 3d 242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 306, 2012 WL 89822
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-6785
StatusPublished

This text of 77 So. 3d 242 (Springer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springer v. State, 77 So. 3d 242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 306, 2012 WL 89822 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 3d 242, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 306, 2012 WL 89822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.