Springer v. State

85 So. 37, 17 Ala. App. 329, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 20
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 16, 1920·No. 6 Div. 611.·Published

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

Defendant was indicted and convicted of violating the prohibition laws and received a fine and sentence.. There is no bill of exceptions in the record,. and more than six months has elapsed since the defendant was sentenced. The indictment and judgment appear to be regular.

There are no errors in the record, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Springer v. State, 85 So. 37, 17 Ala. App. 329, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

85 So. 37 (Springer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.