Springer v. State
85 So. 37, 17 Ala. App. 329, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 20
This text of 85 So. 37 (Springer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Springer v. State, 85 So. 37, 17 Ala. App. 329, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinion
Defendant was indicted and convicted of violating the prohibition laws and received a fine and sentence.. There is no bill of exceptions in the record,. and more than six months has elapsed since the defendant was sentenced. The indictment and judgment appear to be regular.
There are no errors in the record, and the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 So. 37, 17 Ala. App. 329, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-state-alactapp-1920.