Springer v. Slemmer

181 N.E. 888, 124 Ohio St. 670, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 361
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1932
Docket22985
StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.E. 888 (Springer v. Slemmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Springer v. Slemmer, 181 N.E. 888, 124 Ohio St. 670, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 361 (Ohio 1932).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of Pelton v. Bemis, 44 Ohio St., 51, and Groesbeck v. Cincinnati, 51 Ohio St., 365.

In this cause the demurrer to the amended petition was properly sustained for the reason that the action was one for the collection of an assessment *671 and was brought more than one year after the assessment was collected.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.E. 888, 124 Ohio St. 670, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 670, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-slemmer-ohio-1932.