Springer v. Peterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Springer v. Peterson

1 Blackf. 188, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 15

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 1822

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Blackf. 188 (Springer v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Springer v. Peterson, 1 Blackf. 188, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 15 (Ind. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

THE hill of exceptions in this case not being sealed by a majority of the judges present, but by the president alone, a rule, upon the associate judges to show cause why a mandamus requiring them to seal the bill should not issue, was granted atibe Inst May term upon the motion of the appellants. The rule [189]*189having been served and no cause shown, the Court at the last term awarded a peremptory mandamus. At this term the bill was returned sealed by the judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE hill of exceptions in this case not being sealed by a majority of the judges present, but by the president alone, a rule, upon the associate judges to show cause why a mandamus requiring them to seal the bill should not issue, was granted atibe Inst May term upon the motion of the appellants. The rule [189]*189having been served and no cause shown, the Court at the last term awarded a peremptory mandamus. At this term the bill was returned sealed by the judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Blackf. 188, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-peterson-ind-1822.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack