Springer v. Peterson
1 Blackf. 188, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 15
Opinion
THE hill of exceptions in this case not being sealed by a majority of the judges present, but by the president alone, a rule, upon the associate judges to show cause why a mandamus requiring them to seal the bill should not issue, was granted atibe Inst May term upon the motion of the appellants. The rule [189] having been served and no cause shown, the Court at the last term awarded a peremptory mandamus. At this term the bill was returned sealed by the judges.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Springer v. Peterson, 1 Blackf. 188, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 15 (Ind. 1822).
1 Blackf. 188 (Springer v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Otenberger v. Hawes
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)
Dickensheets v. Kaufman
28 Ind. 251 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1867)