Springer v. Myers
This text of 29 Ind. 464 (Springer v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint charges the defendant with obstructing an alley which had been laid out and dedicated to public use on the eastern boundary of Jobtown, by the original proprietors thereof. The second paragraph of defendants answer alleged that the alley had been vacated by nonuser for more than twenty years. 'The demurrer filed to this paragraph was overruled. The plaintiff replied, that if the alley had not been used for twenty years, it was occasioned by the wrongful act of the defendant in refusing [465]*465to allow the public to use it. To this a demurrer was sustained. A trial by the court resulted in a finding and judgment for the defendant.
The recorded plat of the town, introduced in evidence by the plaintiff', did not show an alley on the eastern boundary thereof, and there was no evidence showing that there ever was an alley there. It is unimportant whether the demurrers were properly decided, as the finding of the court was correct on the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Ind. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-myers-ind-1868.