Springer v. Club Med, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Springer v. Club Med, Inc.

240 A.D.2d 395, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 395 (Springer v. Club Med, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Springer v. Club Med, Inc., 240 A.D.2d 395, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered May 17, 1996, as granted the motion by the defendant Club Med, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for defamation against Club Med, Inc. Viewed in the context of the subject article, the statements complained of were not defamatory. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered May 17, 1996, as granted the motion by the defendant Club Med, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for defamation against Club Med, Inc. Viewed in the context of the subject article, the statements complained of were not defamatory. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 395, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/springer-v-club-med-inc-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack